Next: About this document
truept
PHYS220 - Scientific Modelling
Dr Neil Holbrook
E7A 632, Ph: 9850-8429
Modelling in the atmosphere and ocean sciences
El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO): A case study example
- Introduction
- What is El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO)?
- Large Scale Precipitation Changes
- Mechanisms of ENSO (Part I: Observations)
- A Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Phenomenon
- Mechanisms of ENSO (Part II: Models)
- The atmosphere model of Zebiak and Cane (ZC)
- The ocean model of ZC
- Extended form of reduced gravity model + thermodynamics
- Coupled model results
- ENSO prediction
- Coupled General Circulation Models (CGCMs)
Introduction
What is El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO)?
- Irregular (aperiodic) oscillation of the coupled ocean-atmosphere
climate system, every 2-7 years on average.
- Consequences of ENSO may include droughts over western Pacific
(esp. Australia) and extreme rainfall over eastern Pacific
(esp. Peru).
- 1982-83 ENSO responsible for severe drought over Australia,
rain inundation over Peru and Ecuador, mass mortality of fish
and bird life, US$8 billion damages and as many as 2000 lives
lost.
Figure: Ropelewski and Halpert (1987)
- Historically, an anomalous warm current observed off
Ecuador and Peru around Christmas time during certain years
(irregular)
- so named El Niño (Spanish for ``the Christ child'',
or ``the boy'')
- may dramatically affect Peruvian anchovy and guano industries
- Sir Gilbert Walker (
1900) identified a global scale sea level
pressure (SLP) fluctuation
Southern Oscillation (SO)
- lower SLP in western tropical Pacific, higher
SLP in eastern Pacific
- higher SLP in western tropical Pacific, lower
SLP in eastern Pacific
- Jacob Bjerknes (1969) demonstrated links between the SO and sea
surface temperature (SST) changes across the tropical Pacific Ocean
associated with El Niño (EN)
proposed a two-way
coupling between ocean and atmosphere!
- became known as El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
- El Niño (EN)
ocean component - Southern Oscillation (SO)
atmosphere component
- Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) is the standardised pressure
difference between Tahiti and Darwin; a convenient measure of
the SO.
See figure 1.1 of Philander (1990) (adapted from Trenberth and Shea (1987)) and Figure 18.1, Trenberth (1992)
Large Scale Precipitation Changes
During typical El Niño years, precipitation tends to
- decrease over tropical western Pacific, maritime continent,
(north)eastern Australia
- increase over central-eastern tropical Pacific, Peru and Ecuador
Note: During strong El Niños, eastern Australia may be
affected by drought!
Note: During La Niña (associated with opposite phase of the
Southern Oscillation) years, this precipitation pattern tends to
reverse.
Note: Appears to be global associations!
See figure 1.15 of Philander (1990) (from Ropelewski and Halpert (1987))
Mechanisms of ENSO
(Part I: Observations)
- Sir Gilbert Walker, early in 20th century, described the global
scale SO, but failed to link this with El Niño.
- Jacob Bjerknes, in the 1960s, not only empirically connected the
SO with El Niño, but also proposed a two-way coupling of the
atmosphere and ocean in the tropical Pacific.
major step forward in ENSO theory.
A Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Phenomenon
During ``normal'' conditions, there is a
- strong east-west (Walker) Circulation
- huge heat reservoir in western Pacific Warm Pool (WPWP)
- depressed thermocline in the western tropical Pacific and raised
in the east
- deep cumulus convection over WPWP and maritime continent region
- clearer skies over central-eastern tropical-subtropical Pacific
During El Niño conditions, the
- Walker Circulation has relaxed (and may reverse direction)
- thermocline raises in the western tropical Pacific and depresses
in the central-eastern Pacific (eastward propagation as a wave
in about 2-3months
Kelvin wave)
- central-eastern tropical Pacific SSTs increase by up to
1-2
C
- SSTs in the WPWP region cools by up to 0.5
C
- deep cumulus convection migrates with warm SST anomalies
- skies become persistently clearer over western tropical Pacific,
maritime continent and (north)eastern Australia
See Plate 16, Trenberth (1992); courtesy University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)
- Since then, models of ENSO have developed.
- Strong SST gradient from west to east across the Pacific.
- Wind driven ocean dynamics causes unusually cold SSTs in the
eastern equatorial Pacific in three ways (mechanisms) ...
- horizontal advection (flow)
of cold water
north and westwards from off west coast of South America. - equatorial upwelling.
- upward thermocline movement (in the east Pacific the
thermocline goes to the surface, while warm water
piles up in the western Pacific).
- All of these factors have some importance in ocean dynamics.
- Bjerknes (1969) referred to the Walker circulation changes as
a ``chain reaction''.
- increase Walker circulation (WC)
increase
SST gradient which maintains WC. - decrease WC (through decreased easterly trades)
decrease SST gradient
weakens WC.
- Positive feedback in each phase of the SO, i.e., instability of
the coupled ocean-atmosphere system (Philander et al. 1984).
- Bjerknes couldn't explain the `turnabout' mechanism.
- Wyrtki (1975, 1979) pointed out that the ocean response, during
El Niño, is dynamical rather than thermodynamic (i.e., due
to variations in surface heat flux).
- Wyrtki shifted attention from SST variability to sea level
variability.
- Suggested eastward propagation of Kelvin waves (supported by
numerical experiments in early 1980s) across equatorial Pacific.
- Rasmusson and Carpenter (1982) ``composite'' (1951, 1953, 1957,
1965, 1969, 1972) El Niño sea surface temperature anomalies
(SSTA) across the Pacific
step forward also - aim
for modellers to emulate this!
Figure: Rasmusson and Carpenter (1982)
Mechanisms of ENSO
(Part II: Models)
- Bjerknes-Wyrtki theory failed to explain turnabout between
El Niño and La Niña states.
- Zebiak and Cane (1987) (hereafter ZC, an ``intermediate model'') was
a serious attempt to model the Bjerknes-Wyrtki ideas, through a set
of equations.
- ZC is a ...
- linear model;
- two-layer ocean;
- idealised coastline geometry;
and permits vertical movements of the thermocline.
- On El Niño time scales, only two types of waves are of interest
- long Rossby waves and equatorial Kelvin waves.
- Long Rossby waves propagate energy westward, while Kelvin waves
travel eastward.
- These properties are essential to El Niño.
- Cane and Zebiak (1985) and Cane et al. (1986) discussed a
recharging of the equatorial ``reservoir'' of warm water
precondition for El Niño. Similar idea with
sea level data by Wyrtki (1985).
- Once enough warm water, Kelvin waves move warm water to east
Pacific
El Niño onset.
- Suarez and Schopf (1988) and Battisti and Hirst (1989) provided
a clear picture (using linear equatorial ocean dynamical models)
of ENSO cycle
another major step forward in ENSO
theory.
- Timing: In very simple terms ...
- westerly wind anomaly in central equatorial Pacific forces
eastward downwelling Kelvin wave depressing thermocline
in the east (2-3 months).
- Kelvin wave reflected at eastern boundary as westward
propagating Rossby wave which travels across to western
Pacific (
9-12 months). - Rossby wave reflected at western boundary as eastward upwelling Kelvin wave
decays El Niño. - onset of La Niña.
- Hence, original ``warm'' signal later followed by ``cold'' signal
(delayed)
delayed oscillator mechanism,
Battisti and Hirst (1989).
- where
- T is the SST anomaly in the eastern equatorial Pacific
- c is the sum of all processes that induce local changes
in T (horizontal advection, thermal damping, anomalous upwelling
and changes in local subsurface structure (including local
wave effects))
- b accounts for reflection of Rossby waves into Kelvin waves
at western boundary
-
is the delay (lag) due to this reflection
Case: If
, where
is the
growth rate + angular frequency, then when
, the (oscillating)
solution to (1) grows
ENSO mode.
- This delayed oscillator mechanism accounts for the behaviour
in these ``intermediate'' coupled models (and certain higher
resolution coupled GCMs). Not easy to show in
nature.
- ZC coupled model has been shown to have ENSO predictive skill
out to a year or more in advance.
- Limitations of ZC model ...
- west Pacific changes (through to midlatitudes) preceding
El Niño not accounted for.
- SO behaves differently to El Niño (cf. E. Pacific
SSTA vs SOI - Fig 18.1b Trenberth). Not reproduced in the
model.
-
these omissions suggest that important connections
have been neglected in ZC.
The atmosphere model of ZC
- Able to simulate tropical surface wind anomalies as well
as any Atmospheric General Circulation Model (AGCM).
- Able to simulate ENSO surface wind anomalies when driven by
ENSO SST anomalies (but confined to tropics where linear
approximations are valid - no good in midlatitudes).
The ocean model of ZC
In this lecture, I'm simply going to introduce you to the fundamental
equations of the classic shallow-water (or reduced gravity)
model which forms the basis of the ZC ocean model dynamics. This
relatively simple model has been extremely successful in describing
upper ocean variability on seasonal to interannual (year-to-year)
time scales!!
Extended form of reduced gravity model + thermodynamics
Linear hydrostatic motion in the active layer of the ocean is driven by
the wind stress,
, that acts as a body force. This motion is
associated with a displacement,
, of the interface and is described
by the shallow water equations (Philander 1990, pp.106-107 and
figure 3.3)
where
,
are the east and north wind stress components
per unit density.
Note: The ZC ocean model also includes a friction (damping)
term on the RHS of these three equations (see p.596 Trenberth (1992)
The first two equations are the linear momentum equations
while the third equation is the linearised form of the
continuity equation.
These equations are shown here in a Cartesian coordinate system, which is
fixed in the rotating earth. The velocity components in the eastward (x)
and northward (y) directions are u and v, respectively, while t
measures time. The equator is at y = 0. Effects caused by the rotation
and curvature of the earth can enter through the Coriolis parameter
where
. Here,
denotes the rate of rotation
of the earth and a its radius. The gravitational acceleration, g,
because of the stratification, is effectively reduced to
The reduced gravity wave speed is
This is sometimes written as
where
is the equivalent depth.
Reasonable numerical values are
Now, for climate variability experiments, this reduced gravity ocean
model with a single active layer is insufficient, because SST is determined
by ...
- the dynamics and physics of thinner surface layer (Ekman layer)
- surface heating
So, ...
- the active layer is further divided into two
- the thermodynamics, which cause changes in SST, are governed
by a separate equation (not shown here) which determines
temperature changes in the upper ocean mixed layer.
Note: For those interested persons who wish to learn more
about the complete equations for both the atmosphere and ocean models,
read pp.594-598 of Trenberth (1992)
How good is the ocean model?
- Wyrtki hypothesis requires that the model is able to capture
large scale changes in thermocline depth during ENSO cycle.
- When forced by ``composite'' ENSO wind anomalies, the ZC
ocean model simulates observed ``composite'' ENSO SST anomalies
in low latitudes as well as any Ocean General Circulation Model
(OGCM).
- Accurate in eastern Pacific, understates SST anomalies in western
Pacific.
- Poor representation of upwelling off west coast of South America
probably due to ...
- coarse resolution;
- idealised coastline geometry.
Coupled model results
Figure 18.2, Trenberth (1992) and figure 18.4, Trenberth (1992)
Figure 18.5, Trenberth (1992) and figure 18.6, Trenberth (1992)
Figure 18.7, Trenberth (1992)
ENSO prediction
- (Versions of) ZC is the only dynamical model used for
forecasting ENSO.
- Statistical models have revealed important connections in
ocean-atmosphere data and contributed substantially to our
understanding of ENSO (e.g., Barnett et al. (1988)).
- Statistical models generally have greater predictive skill than
dynamical models at short leads (< 5 months) and less skill
at longer leads.
Figure 18.8, Trenberth (1992) and figure 18.9, Trenberth (1992)
- Though ENSO predictability is intrinsically limited, current
limitations are probably mostly due to inadequate data and
model inadequacies.
Coupled General Circulation Models (CGCMs)
- Uncoupled (forced with prescribed SSTA), AGCMs typically represent
global winds quite well, but represent the equatorial winds
relatively poorly.
- Typically, for coarse AGCMs, surface wind stress and heat flux
are not represented all that well in the tropics
yet crucial for forcing ocean El Niño.
Figure 18.10, Trenberth (1992)
- For coarse resolution OGCMs (say
),
this is too coarse to simulate equatorial wave dynamics and
upwelling also far too weak.
- Intermediate models still as valuable (or more valuable) than
CGCMs.
- CGCMs limited by either coarse resolution or short experiments
(due to computing limitations).
- However, potential value of inclusion of midlatitude influences
(though significance not clear, and noisy (e.g., synoptic weather)).
- However, still the future will probably be with CGCMs as computing
power becomes greater.
- Finally: interannual variability may change under
greenhouse warming
need to simulate ENSO in
CGCMs.
Next: About this document